House of Cards: Feminist Shite

(If anybody doesn’t want to read spoilers of Seasons 1-4 of the American TV series House of Cards, don’t read this post.)

I recently finished the fourth and most recent season of the American TV series House of Cards, starring Kevin Spacey and nobody else who can act.  Several people had recommended it to me, with one or two saying it was “amazing”.  Perhaps I should have been forewarned by the fact that two of these people were women of a feminist persuasion.

Seasons 1 and 2 weren’t bad, and depicted an utterly unscrupulous and ruthless Kevin Spacey manipulating situations and people as he wormed his way from Democratic party whip to Vice President and finally to President of the United States.  What I found most interesting about the first two seasons was that it showed what I suspect is the true nature of politics, i.e. politicians making decisions which affect millions of people purely to further their own personal ambitions.  The series lays bare the corrupt and unprincipled nature of politicians and politics for all to see, yet the show is loved by people who favour big government and believe politicians should have ever-more involvement in people’s lives.  I know at least one fan who decries the antics of Kevin Spacey’s Frank Underwood yet intends to vote for Hillary Clinton in November.  Go figure.

But somewhere between Seasons 2 and 3 the feminists got hold of the script and effectively made the show all about Frank Underwood’s wife, played by Robin Wright.  She played a reasonable supporting role in the first two seasons, ably assisting her husband in his rise to the top (but also betraying him in more ways than one), but during Season 3 she revealed her own political ambitions and contrived to land herself the position of US ambassador to the UN.  During the nomination process her opponents pointed to her utter lack of experience yet she obtains the position anyway thanks to her husband’s prerogative to just appoint somebody of his choosing – whereupon she promptly makes a complete idiot of herself and the United States by being played like a fiddle by the Russians.  I thought at this point she’d be relegated to a supporting role again, her character having been shown to lack experience or competence in a political role –  as her opponents were saying (and any reasonably viewer thinking) all along.

But no.  The feminists who had hijacked the script were having none of it.  Season 4 saw Frank Underwood lying in a coma having been shot in an assassination attempt, a weak VP in temporary charge, and First Lady Claire Underwood running about doing what she likes as though she had some constitutional authority to do so.  A strong, experienced, and somewhat ruthless female secretary of state allows herself to be bullied by Claire into submission, to the ridiculous extent that it is Claire who is sent into a room alone with the Russian president to negotiate a solution to some strategic issue of vital importance.  And of course, Claire gets the notoriously stubborn Putin-a-like to capitulate by browbeating him in a manner in which I suspect feminists think women should speak to their husbands.  As the season advances, Claire finds herself able to order members of the presidential staff around on whim, involving herself in matters of national security even to the point of being in the situation room, and not a single person in the administration raises a squeak in protest.

This wouldn’t be so irritating were it not for the fact that each scene of Claire’s brilliance takes on exactly the same form.  She wears the same arse-hugging style of dress or skirt in every shot, she manages a single facial expression throughout the entire series, and for each pivotal scene the only thing that changes are the words being spoken.  It quickly becomes repetitive, and not a little tedious.  But not content with that, the feminists have to ramp it up by making Claire the object of seemingly every key man’s sexual desire as well.  In Seasons 1 and 2 she is shagging a rather hip British photographer who is world famous, the type that would in real life be hanging around models from Eastern Europe.  But in House of Cards he’s pining after the ageing wife of a US senator.  She finds herself fending off the advances of the (divorced) Russian president, who tells Frank that she is truly beautiful, or something like that.  Because prominent Russians are well known for flattering American women and have difficulty picking up stunners back home.  Uh-huh.  In Season 4 Claire is shagging a famous author, a younger man hired by Frank to write their speeches or biographies, or something.  When Frank finds out he doesn’t mind, and this ruthless motherfucker who committed two murders in his ascendancy to the White House doesn’t just accept it, but gives the couple his blessing.  Again, the idea that a famous author would fall in love with the older wife of the US president instead of having a beautiful, loving partner of his own doesn’t even get questioned.  Despite various betrayals on her part of her husband’s political maneuverings plus the aforementioned infidelities, Frank wakes from his coma praising her to the heavens, forgiving her in full, and stating in unequivocal terms that she is the most important person in the entire series.  Even the wife of the Republican presidential nominee is forced by the scriptwriters to shower her with gushing praise during a visit to the White House.  Season 4 ends with her being nominated as the VP on her husband’s ticket, having seen off seasoned and ruthless female opponents by making hackneyed speeches in a figure-hugging dress.

The audience, by having it rammed down their throats every episode, is expected to unconditionally accept that Claire Underwood is a brilliant politician, responsible for every success her husband has achieved, desired sexually by every man who meets her, and is easily capable as a president herself (there is a Season 5 on the way).  By contrast, despite a brief affair with a young journalist in Season 1, her husband Frank is a greying, cuckolded, semi-invalid who owes her everything.  It is the definition of tedious, and I almost didn’t make it to the end of the series.  Watching this rubbish during the current buildup to the US presidential election, I got the feeling that the scriptwriters were fantasizing about what Michelle Obama could do in her position as First Lady.  Now I see the progressive media praising her speech at the Democratic National Convention for all its worth, I am wondering if a section of the American liberal left haven’t confused real-life politics for a TV show.

Share

14 thoughts on “House of Cards: Feminist Shite

  1. We gave up part way through series 1. Only Spacey bothered to act (and did it very well); the girl playing his wife was just a clothes-horse.

    Also we lost the plot: either bits were missing on our DVDs, or some of the inaudible bits of dialogue carried crucial information. Or maybe we dozed off through sheer boredom.

    Usually it’s the Beeb that makes dialogue inaudible by incompetent direction and the stupid habit of playing music across the dialogue; this showed that Americans can be just as stupid. USA! USA! USA!

    Me, I’m so old that I can remember when stage actors could act whispering, and still let the whole theatre hear what was said. Bring back skilled actors, and directors who know how to use them!

  2. the girl playing his wife was just a clothes-horse.

    Indeed, that is a good description. Hence I was rather annoyed when they made her the central character for the later seasons.

  3. DVD’s I have a nostalgic memory of them.

    I don’t normally watch things, other than what the missus and co have on in the background. Although when I was laid up with a broken arm last year, I self diagnosed Netflix with painkillers, watched every episode of Suits back to back, just about 24/7 which was addictive and then I gave the House of Cards a whirl.

    Enjoyed the initial plot, psychopathic polly killing the dog and scheming DC senators but quickly lost interest and stopped watching it. I get it with the Sheila angle its everywhere these days.

    Watched the two latest episodes of Suits recently and sad to say I thought the plot was a little corny. Bring back The Bill, The Sweeney, Grange Hill and Are you Being Served for a bit of sussy flashing.

  4. I get it with the Sheila angle its everywhere these days.

    Indeed, it is very common in series these days. Game of Thrones is another one which appears to have been hijacked by feminists in the later seasons.

  5. Usually it’s the Beeb that makes dialogue inaudible by incompetent direction and the stupid habit of playing music across the dialogue

    I fully agree with this: I often have to use subtitles nowadays because I find the actors mumble.

    Me, I’m so old that I can remember when stage actors could act whispering, and still let the whole theatre hear what was said.

    Funny, because I’ve just got back from the theatre festival in Avignon, and one of the things I talked about with my companion was how brilliantly the actors could convey dialogue loudly – but without shouting.

  6. “I often have to use subtitles nowadays because I find the actors mumble.”

    I don’t think that’s the director or the actor’s fault. I think it’s our age. Young people aren’t doing that.

  7. It’s not just House of Cards that’s been fem-jacked. I’ve just watched some previews of the coming summer movies, and it’s surprising how women have taken over the narrative. The PC quality of movies may have started with The Martian, but it’s gotten much worse (and I do consider it worse) with movies since then. I never liked the DC and Marvel movies, but the comics were a big part of my childhood, and it’s nauseating to see what is happening in the movies. Even the trailers are unwatchable. I’ll give up completely when South Park goes PC, and we suddenly find out that Kenny was a girl all along.

  8. Forget that rubbish watch Fargo and seasons 1 and 2 of Fargo the series on Netflix instead absolutely awesome TV, great acting and production and for once there is a coherent beginning and end.

  9. Ha ha. I have just received a present of the boxed set of the original House of Cards. Come the autumn, we can have some jolly evenings.

  10. “First Lady Claire Underwood running about doing what she likes as though she had some constitutional authority to do so”

    Isn’t that exactly what happened during Wilson’s second term?

  11. Isn’t that exactly what happened during Wilson’s second term?

    I have no idea!

  12. Well put. BTW, Russian women are pretty good at gender warfare: they know how to get what they want from their husbands while keeping the marriage afloat. Russian men have developed defense mechanisms, imperfect of course, but probably effective enough against a woman like Claire. But I think you’re underrating her: there are quite a few men – not just the “Yes, Mistress” cohort – with a thing for older women. To the British photographer, she must be the ultimate celebrity. Also, some men would never miss a chance to cuckold the President of the United States.

    “…I am wondering if a section of the American liberal left haven’t confused real-life politics for a TV show.”

    Some Russian journo has claimed that Putin is getting his ideas on American politics from “The House of Cards.”

  13. My “well put” referred to the whole post but specifically to this bit:

    “Claire gets the notoriously stubborn Putin-a-like to capitulate by browbeating him in a manner in which I suspect feminists think women should speak to their husbands.”

  14. To the British photographer, she must be the ultimate celebrity.

    Oh, he’d sleep with her of course…as one of his harem, especially if they had history from their younger days. It was his pining after her that I found unrealistic.

    My “well put” referred to the whole post but specifically to this bit

    Thanks! I was rather pleased with that line. 🙂

Comments are closed.