Time to Cooperate

When the Enron scandal brought down Arthur Andersen, it was an open secret that the hearts of the other four of the “Big Five” accounting firms skipped a beat.  Arthur Andersen had done nothing that the other four hadn’t also been doing, but Arthur Andersen was the unlucky company which got caught, prompting the others to change their work pratices pretty damned quickly.

A friend of mine tells me that Shell has sent an internal memo around saying there is a time to be a competitor, and there is a time to show support, and now is the time to show support for BP over the Macondo well disaster.

I am certain that the other five supermajors will all be contributing everything they can to help BP, which is why suggestions to hand everything over to ExxonMobil are pretty daft (even assuming that Exxon really want a runaway well spewing crude all over the Gulf of Mexico dumped on their desk because they happen to be American and acceptable to the more nationalistic of the US public at large).  It is the entire industry which is under scrutiny here and the ramifications of this disaster will be far reaching and affect all oil companies severely.  It is very much in everybody’s interests to get this thing under control and minimise the damage.

Also, I expect when the technical aspects of the accident become known to the other majors they might well see some similarities, or maybe even little difference, with their own operating practices.  Maybe one or two of them will be able to relate what happened to BP to a situation they had previously.  Guaranteed they will be changing their procedures as we speak, but I wonder if there are any oil company executives waking in the night in a cold sweat thinking “That could have been us.”

This entry was posted in Macondo, Oil & Gas. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Time to Cooperate

  1. Tatyana says:

    Similar to emergence of new safety procedures in construction industry or installments of materials tests and codes. Several major high-casualty hotels fires triggered establishment of several international standards re: fire-deterrent materials (carpet, linen, vertical applied coverings) for Class II commercial occupancy classes and smoke, smoldering and “upholstered”-burnt tests, as well as requirements of secondary egress and alarm systems and signage.

    The Code has been working here, in US, for so many decades now, that it became an absolute given, instilled firmly in psyche: when I saw, about a year ago, news (complete with pictures and video) about a fire in some Russian nightclub where there was no secondary egress and a main entrance was locked after the party started, and where all the materials inside were highly flammable, I screamed [foolishly] – “But it’s against the Code!!!”

    Established procedures, codes and protocols are all fine and good – but the practical reality is somewhat different. I’m sure your own experience on Sakhalin and elsewhere provides oyu with more examples. Wherever people are under pressure (for time or money or both), no matter how good the written instruction are, they’re no guarantee that someone will invent a turnaround.

Comments are closed.