On the killing of Boris Nemtsov

I received the news that Boris Nemtsov had been murdered as I was leaving the cinema.  When I jumped to the news sites to confirm the story, my first thoughts were that this is another Kirov.  Sergey Kirov was a popular leader in the post-Lenin Soviet Union, and was shot and killed by unknown assassins in 1934.  Speculation abounds that Stalin ordered the hit, but despite the obvious threat that Kirov posed to Stalin’s leadership, there is no evidence which supports his involvement.

What we do know is that Stalin siezed the opportunity to launch a nationwide campaign of repression against enemies both real and imagined, having shed crocodile tears over Kirov’s death and vowing to handle the matter personally.  Involvement in Kirov’s assassination became a common accusation in the show trials that followed, as Stalin consolidated his power in what became known as the Great Terror.

Before I had a chance to post this, Streetwise Professor had noted the same parallel:

With a chutzpah that puts OJ Simpson’s pledge to track down the real killers to shame, Putin announced that he is putting his Chekist skilz to work and taking personal charge of the investigation.

In other words, we are going to see a reprise of the Kirov murder, which Stalin exploited to justify the purges that began soon thereafter. Note the similarity:

“Comrade Stalin personally directed the investigation of Kirov’s assassination. He questioned Nikolayev at length. The leaders of the Opposition placed the gun in Nikolayev’s hand!” (Barmine, Alexander, One Who Survived, New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1945.)

Perhaps the anti-war activities and revelations about Putin’s lies about Ukraine were the proximate cause of Nemtsov’s killing. But I think that the murder serves a far larger purpose for Putin. It eliminates a gadfly, yes, but Nemtsov was hardly a threat. But a la Stalin and Kirov, the murder gives Putin a pretext to unleash a full-scale repression.

As with the murder of Anna Politkovsyaya (fitted-up Chechens notwithstanding), I doubt we’ll ever know who killed Nemtsov because, as the Prof. points out, Putin’s personal involvement will:

“[E]nsure that no mistakes are made that could result in the identification of the real executioners. There are frames to be fitted.

Indeed.  The last thing that Putin et al will be interested in is finding the killer, they’ll care far more about exploiting this for all it’s worth.  Although it would be tempting to suggest Nemtsov was whacked on Putin’s orders, I think this would be unlikely.  I don’t believe Nemtsov posed enough of a threat to Putin’s rule, and direct assassinations are not his style.  I suspect it was more of a case of Nemtsov being a modern day Thomas Becket, and I was about to post this when I noticed David Duff had beaten me to it:

So, on the day that ‘Vlad the Impaler’ successfully imitates Henry II of England by asking the Russian equivalent of ‘Who will rid me of this turbulent priest/irritating critic’ … the exceedingly courageous, liberal politician, Boris Nemtsov, was shot down in cold blood by four gunmen.

Perhaps some hothead, hearing Putin had a problem, jumped in to do his patriotic duty?  With this sort of thing going on, it will be difficult to rule out an independent group thinking they were doing Putin a favour:

Putin’s Russia has crossed a Rubicon: it now has sanctioned the Anti-Maidan Movement, a domestic version of Hitler’s storm troopers, and thus created a monster that almost certainly will engage in pogroms against one group or another in the future, according to Moscow commentator Matvey Ganapolsky.

As Ganapolsky reports, “the new Russian storm troopers call themselves ‘the Anti-Maidan Movement” and have ostensibly been created by the Militant Brotherhood, the Union of Afghanistan Veterans, the Central Cossack Forces and the Night Wolves, thus allowing the Kremlin plausible deniability about who and what is really behind them. (h/t Samizdata)

There is an interesting discussion going on over at The Dilettante’s place which includes a list of possible perpetrators.

Personally I have no idea, but there is one thing of which we can be absolutely sure: the Russian population will swallow wholesale whatever bullshit the Kremlin will come out with.  For a nation of individuals who believe they can sniff out bullshit across a mile of Steppe – which they often can – they don’t half believe in some batshit insane conspiracy theories.  Take a look at this comment, from a Russian, over at Mr Duff’s place:

It’s a sort of strange… the last summer… the USA insists sanctions against Russia to be introduced, the EU doesn’t go for it… MH17 falls… and then EU introduces the sanctions.

The end of the winter… the USA insists new sanctions against Russia to be introduced and Russia is to be isolated the EU doesn’t go for it… a well-known (but not popular) oppositioneer is killed… what’s next?

Yet laughably, a few comments down the same chap points to an article in The Daily Telegraph and says:

If anyone would like I can provide a step-by-step brainwashing analysis of the twaddle written in the article below. It made me laugh. However, as Russian proverb says – it would be merry if it wasn’t so sad. The West judges about Russia by that kind of scribbles made by propagandists.

There’s a lot of this.  Otherwise intelligent Russians are convinced everything they read about Russia is unalloyed, CIA-produced propaganda whilst simultaneously believing the most Blofeldian conspiracy theories dreamed up for domestic consumption.  This is by no means unique to Russia, but it is probably more prevalent there than anywhere I’ve been save the Middle East (there, you’d have little difficulty persuading the bloke at the next desk that the moon is really an Israeli weapon aimed at controlling the minds of American presidents).  I remember being in Sakhalin shortly after the South Korean warship ROKS Cheonan was sunk.  I was at a barbecue and one of the Russian engineers who I vaguely knew – an intelligent, professional man – declared confidently that the Americans sunk it and – these were his exact words – he was “an expert in this subject”.  His expertise consisted of his having studied in South Korea, and this was apparently enough to conclude that the Americans had sunk it in order to demolish any hopes of a peace deal between North and South Korea thus allowing them to keep their troops on the peninsula and dominate the region.

Now there are no doubt plenty of people in the West who also believe this bollocks and more like it, but generally they are on the crankier end of the political spectrum and have limited influence beyond obscure truther web forums.  But in Russia, this kind of stuff is peddled on government media and gobbled up by the mainstream population. I mentioned in an earlier post that most Russians believe they had no choice to invade Crimea because the Americans were about to build a naval base there.  The accept without question the Kremlin line that Russia cannot tolerate having Nato on its borders, despite Russia enjoying borders with Poland as a Nato member since 1999 and Estonia and Latvia since 2004.

So I think it will come as no surprise if, in the coming weeks, we hear from ordinary Russians that Nemtsov was killed by American spooks looking to discredit Putin/escalate the Ukrainian crisis/galvanise the Europeans into accepting stiffer sanctions and all manner of other nutjob conspiracy theories.  And all the while they’ll find their own freedoms curtailed, their internet monitored, their economy crumbling, and more outspoken people beaten or killed as Russia rushes headlong back to the murderous, chaotic, and impoverished 1990s – and possible further.

All in the interests of gaining “respect”.


9 thoughts on “On the killing of Boris Nemtsov

  1. Just to be clear, my list over at “Winterings” is speculation about which fake candidates the Kremlin will come up with over the following days.

    Personally, I think the list of real suspects is a short one:
    (1) Putin/Russian security services.
    (2) Russian ultra-nationalists, either doing Putin a favour or those who believe Putin is not extreme enough in his treatment of “national traitors.”
    Obviously, Putin ultimately is to blame for both. He created the political climate in which such assassinations are possible.

  2. …and I’d now be inclined to go with (2), per your analysis, i.e. some nice friendly thugs from the Anti-Maidan movement.

    I also think this might be part of an experiment to see just how much conspiracist BS the Russian public will swallow from the Kremlin propaganda machine. Putin is like a psychopathic P.T. Barnum: “No despot ever lost power underestimating the intelligence of the Russian people …”

  3. All spot on Tim. The Russian craving for respect, and the belief that you get it by being a thug, is something that I’ve remarked about ever since I started following Russia and Russians closely. It reminds me of urban gang culture or the mafia, but on a national scale. Some time on the South Side of Chicago (and a little on the West Side too) prepared me for understanding Russians. A nation of gangbangers or wannabe gangbangers. (The love of bling is another similarity.)

  4. It was Garry Kasparov, attempting to create a martyr, which is much more useful than an actual opposition leader. He was part of a conspiracy led by the Israelis. And the Martians.

  5. Of course, if it was ultra-nationalists then the Kremlin is probably assessing how friendly to its cause they are.

    If the murderers were Putin fans who killed a “turbulent priest” to please their master then I suspect the trail will “go cold” and they will be allowed to get away with it. In a few years’ time, a suitable patsy will be found (see Anna Politkovskaya “investigation” for details).

    If, on the other hand, these were ultra-ultra-nationalists – possibly fighters returning from the Donbass – who think even Putin is too soft on damn liberals and “national traitors”, then the Kremlin will move against them. They will probably die in a convenient shoot-out with the police or their leader will be found hanged in a hotel room next to a full confession. Like Hitler with Ernst Roehm and the SA, Putin knows his own extremists may one day present more of a threat to him than Nemtsov ever did.

  6. Just to be clear, my list over at “Winterings” is speculation about which fake candidates the Kremlin will come up with over the following days.

    Yes, fair point, I should have made that clear.

    Of course, if it was ultra-nationalists then the Kremlin is probably assessing how friendly to its cause they are.

    Absolutely. I think your analysis here is bang on.

  7. It was Garry Kasparov, attempting to create a martyr, which is much more useful than an actual opposition leader. He was part of a conspiracy led by the Israelis. And the Martians.

    I’m more inclined to believe Nemtsov was on his way to the Kremlin with proof that the CIA shot down MH17, so they scrambled a sniper team to take him out.

    (A bit like they did in The Bourne something or other, where the CIA appear to run a full paramilitary wing in Germany, Italy, and the UK without the knowledge of the host governments. I assume this was their Moscow chapter.)

  8. “…where the CIA appear to run a full paramilitary wing in Germany, Italy, and the UK without the knowledge of the host governments.”

    Wow, Operation Gladio made it to Hollywood?

  9. I noticed your page’s ranking in google’s search results is very low.
    You are loosing a lot of traffic. You need hi Page Rank backlinks to rank in top 10.
    I know – buying them is too expensive. It is better to own them.
    I know how to do that, simply google it:
    Polswor’s Backlinks Source

Comments are closed.